When it comes to popular MPVs in the Indian car market, cars such as Toyota Innova Crysta and Maruti Suzuki Ertiga stand out. The Toyota Innova Crysta, which is sold alongside the newer Innova Hycross, comes exclusively with a 2.4-litre diesel engine which is paired only with the 5-speed manual transmission. An automatic option was offered earlier, but it was discontinued when the Crysta was relaunched in 2023. On the other hand, the Maruti Suzuki Ertiga offers a 1.5-litre K Series petrol engine that is paired with a 5-speed manual or 6-speed torque converter (automatic transmission). It also offers a CNG variant, which is exclusively paired with the 5-speed manual transmission.
Let’s check how the Toyota Innova Crysta and Maruti Ertiga compare against each other when it comes to real-world mileage. This will help determine which of the two is more fuel-efficient, though it’s worth noting they sit in very different price brackets. Before that, let’s take a look at their key specifications.
Table of Contents
Toyota Innova Crysta vs Maruti Ertiga: Key Specs
Comparing the key specifications of cars also becomes crucial when comparing their mileage. This is because certain specs tend to influence the fuel efficiency of cars. For instance, a more powerful engine tends to consume more fuel to generate power as compared to a regular engine. Similarly, the higher kerb weight of cars puts a higher load on the engine, which eventually reduces their fuel efficiency. So, let’s compare the Toyota Innova Crysta and the Maruti Suzuki Ertiga on the basis of their key specifications now. The table below contains these details about both cars:
| Specification | Toyota Innova Crysta | Maruti Suzuki Ertiga |
| Engine | 2.4-litre (2GD-FTV) diesel | 1.5-litre K15C petrol with Smart Hybrid (petrol variants); factory-fitted CNG option |
| Displacement | 2393 cc | 1462 cc |
| Power | 150 PS | Petrol: 103 PS; CNG: 89 PS |
| Torque | 343 Nm | Petrol: 137 Nm; CNG: 121.5 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-speed manual | Petrol: 5-speed MT / 6-speed AT 5-speed MT only |
| Drive layout | Rear Wheel Drive (RWD) | Front Wheel Drive (FWD) |
| Kerb weight | Around 1,730 kg | 1150 to 1205 kg depending upon the variant |
| Fuel tank capacity | 55 litres | 45 litres (Petrol), 60 litres (CNG) |
Toyota Innova Crysta is clearly the much more powerful vehicle, and its kerb weight makes it a much heavier car than the Maruti Ertiga. These things reduce its fuel efficiency, but we must also remember that the fuel and engine type of these vehicles are completely dissimilar. So, let’s see how these specifications influence the real-world mileage of the cars in the sections below.
Also Explore: Maruti Suzuki Ertiga Image Gallery: Interior, Exterior
Toyota Innova Crysta vs Maruti Ertiga: ARAI Claimed Mileage Figures
Claimed mileage figures refer to the mileage recorded by the cars during their ARAI tests. ARAI, i.e., the Automotive Research Association of India, conducts these mileage tests to certify the fuel efficiency of the cars. These tests are conducted in lab conditions and with minimum load. So, the ARAI mileage figures always tend to be on the higher side if we compare them with the real-world mileage of cars. The table below carries important details regarding the ARAI-claimed mileage figures of Toyota Innova Crysta and Maruti Ertiga across their powertrains:
| Engine & Transmission | Fuel Type | Toyota Innova Crysta – ARAI Mileage (km/l) | Maruti Suzuki Ertiga – ARAI Mileage (km/l) |
| 1.5-litre NA Petrol + 6-Speed MT/5-speed MT | NA Petrol | – | 20.51 km/l |
| 1.5-litre NA Petrol + 6-Speed Torque Converter (Automatic) | NA Petrol | – | 20.30 km/l |
| 1.5-litre petrol + CNG – Manual | CNG | – | 26.11 km/kg |
| 2.4-litre Diesel + 5-speed manual | Diesel | 15.10 km/l | – |
Toyota Crysta offers only one diesel manual powertrain, which recorded a mileage of 15.10 km/l during the ARAI mileage test. On the other hand, the petrol and CNG variants of the Maruti Ertiga claim a much higher mileage because of their much-tuned and fuel-efficient engine. So, the Innova Crysta models stand no chance against the Maruti Suzuki Ertiga when it comes to fuel efficiency. However, still, let’s see if the ARAI-claimed mileage figures remain true in real-world conditions or not.
Maruti Ertiga claims a higher mileage with its petrol and CNG models whereas Innova Crysta doesn’t claim a high mileage even during ARAI mileage tests.
Toyota Innova Crysta vs Maruti Ertiga: Real-World Mileage
Real-world mileage of cars is much dependent on your driving style and road conditions. Some cars also come with certain features such as idle start/stop (automatic) that help to increase their fuel efficiency. Some cars are aerodynamically designed to help increase their mileage, whereas the low drag coefficient of cars also helps them deliver higher mileage, especially during highway runs. So, let’s compare the real-world mileage of the Toyota Innova Crysta and the Maruti Ertiga. The table below shows the real-world mileage of both these cars across their powertrains:
| Toyota Innova Crysta NA Petrol – Not Available | Maruti Ertiga 1.5-litre Petrol (Manual) | Maruti Ertiga 1.5-litre Petrol (Automatic) | |
| City | – | 15 km/l | 13 km/l |
| Highway | – | 19 km/l | 18 km/l |
| Average | – | 17 km/l | 15.5 km/l |
| Tank range | – | 765 km | ~698 km |
| Toyota Innova Crysta CNG – Not Available | Maruti Suzuki Ertiga CNG | |
| City | – | 22 km/kg |
| Highway | – | 26 km/kg |
| Average | – | 24 km/kg |
| Tank range | – | 216 km (about 9 kg CNG capacity) |
| Toyota Innova Crysta 2.4-litre Diesel MT | Maruti Ertiga – Diesel Not Available | |
| City | 10.6 km/l | – |
| Highway | 14.3 km/l | – |
| Average | 12.45 km/l | – |
| Tank range | Around 685 km | – |
Maruti Ertiga does not offer a diesel engine whereas Toyota Innova Crysta does not offer a petrol or CNG option. Therefore, comparing the real-world mileage difference of these cars is quite complicated. Yet, just on the basis of their real-world mileage statistics, we can conclude that the Maruti Ertiga proves to be the more fuel-efficient car in real-world conditions. Despite offering a comparatively lower mileage, the tank range offered by Toyota Innova Crysta is quite decent because of its larger tank capacity.
Maruti Suzuki Ertiga proves to be the more fuel-efficient car than Toyota Innova Crysta in the real-world conditions as well.
Also Read: Toyota Innova Crysta Image Gallery: Interior, Exterior
Toyota Innova Crysta vs Maruti Ertiga: Fuel-Cost Comparison
After comparing the real-world mileage of cars, it is natural for us to compare their periodic fuel costs. So, we will compare the monthly, yearly, and 5-yearly fuel costs of these cars. Let’s assume that both Toyota Innova Crysta and Maruti Suzuki Ertiga run 1500 kms every month. Also, let’s consider the latest prices of petrol (Rs. 111.18), diesel (Rs. 97.50), and CNG (Rs. 88) to calculate the periodic fuel costs of both cars. The table below carries the fuel-cost comparison of Toyota Innova Crysta vs Maruti Ertiga:
| Innova Crysta Diesel (MT) | Ertiga Petrol (MT) | Ertiga Petrol (AT) | Ertiga CNG (MT) | |
| Monthly Running | 1,500 km | 1,500 km | 1,500 km | 1,500 km |
| Monthly Fuel Use | 120.5 litres | 88.2 litres | 96.8 litres | 62.5 litres |
| Average Monthly Fuel Cost | ₹ 11,747 | ₹9,794 | ₹10,742 | ₹ 5,500 |
| Average Yearly Fuel Cost | ₹ 1.41 lakh | ₹1.18 lakh | ₹1.29 lakh | ₹ 66,000 |
| 5-Yearly Fuel Cost | ₹ 7.05 lakh | ₹5.88 lakh | ₹6.45 lakh | ₹ 3.30 lakh |
From the above table, it is clear that the CNG variants of Maruti Ertiga are the most cost-effective option for car buyers. The petrol variants of Maruti Ertiga also incur less fuel costs as compared to the diesel variants of Toyota Innova Crysta. Despite that, the difference isn’t huge as diesel rates are lower than petrol rates. So, keeping all these things in mind will help you choose the right car according to your driving preferences, monthly running, and fuel budget.
Maruti Ertiga variants are far more cost-effective as compared to the variants of Toyota Innova Crysta, when we compare their monthly, yearly, and 5-yearly fuel costs.
Toyota Innova Crysta vs Maruti Ertiga: Pricing Comparison
Finally, let’s compare the prices of Toyota Innova Crysta and Maruti Ertiga cars. The table below contains the pricing differences from base to top models of both cars:
| Model | Variant (Base to Top) | Price (Ex-Showroom) |
| Toyota Innova Crysta | GX to ZX | ₹19.99 lakh to ₹26.83 lakh |
| Maruti Ertiga | LXi to ZXi | ₹8.69 lakh to ₹13.13 lakh |
Maruti Suzuki Ertiga is not only more fuel-efficient, but it is also far less expensive than Innova Crysta when we compare their base and top-spec models. This is natural because Innova Crysta belongs to the premium MPV segment, whereas Maruti Ertiga caters to the needs of those who seek fuel economy.
Also Read: Maruti Suzuki Ertiga Alternatives: Competitors of Maruti Suzuki Ertiga
Summary
Both Innova Crysta and Maruti Ertiga are popular cars in the MPV segment. Both of them offer a plush ride quality and rear-seat comfort. However, when it comes to mileage, Ertiga remains the popular option among car buyers because of its higher mileage across the powertrains. Yet, the diesel variants of Toyota Innova Crysta remain the popular option for highway driving because of their higher power and ability to overtake other vehicles swiftly.
For city use, the CNG variants of Maruti Ertiga prove to be the most fuel-efficient option, followed by its NA petrol variants. For a mix of highway and city driving, the NA petrol variants of Maruti Ertiga can be a good option. However, the Ertiga would struggle to offer the necessary power for uphill driving, especially with its CNG models.
Related Blogs:
Maruti Ertiga vs Kia Carnival Real-World Mileage Comparison
Toyota Innova Crysta vs Kia Carnival Real-World Mileage Comparison
Maruti Ertiga vs Maruti XL6 Real World Mileage Comparison
FAQs about Innova Crysta and Ertiga Mileage
Q. Which car is better for city driving: Maruti Ertiga or Toyota Innova Crysta?
The Maruti Ertiga is better suited to city driving than the Toyota Innova Crysta. Its smaller size and lighter weight make it easier to manoeuvre and park, and its fuel-efficient petrol and CNG variants keep running costs low in stop-and-go traffic.
Q. Which car is suitable for driving in ghats: Toyota Innova Crysta or Maruti Suzuki Ertiga?
The Toyota Innova Crysta is the better option for ghat roads. Its 2.4-litre diesel engine produces 343 Nm of torque, far more than the Ertiga’s 137 Nm, which makes climbing steep inclines with a full load much easier.
Q. Should I prefer the Ertiga or Innova Crysta for long trips?
Choose the Ertiga for better mileage (preferably the petrol variant, since the CNG offers only about 216 km of CNG range and stations can be scarce), or the Innova Crysta for more comfort and features.
Q. Should I prefer a Maruti Ertiga or Toyota Innova Crysta for daily commuting?
Maruti Ertiga seems to be a better option for daily commuting due to its higher mileage than the Toyota Innova Crysta. The CNG variants of Ertiga are especially recommended for daily commuters.
Q. Which is the better car for families: Toyota Innova Crysta or Maruti Ertiga?
Toyota Innova Crysta offers better comfort and features and is therefore ideal for families who prioritise comfort over everything else. On the other hand, Maruti Ertiga would be the better choice for families looking for an affordable car with excellent mileage.
Q. How much mileage do Maruti Ertiga petrol variants offer in the city?
The Maruti Ertiga petrol manual offers a mileage of up to 15 km/l in the city, while the automatic offers up to 13 km/l. Actual mileage can vary depending on your driving style and road conditions
Q. How much mileage do the diesel variants of Toyota Innova Crysta offer on the highway?
Toyota Innova Crysta offers a mileage of up to 14.3 km/l on the highway. The exact mileage will vary according to your driving style and road conditions.
