The Skoda Kushaq has become a formidable competitor in India’s compact SUV market, praised for its European design, sturdy build quality, and lively performance. With its practical interior and upscale features, the Kushaq appeals to young professionals and enthusiasts searching for a stylish SUV that doesn’t compromise on reliability and comfort.
To cater to different driving preferences, the Skoda Kushaq is equipped with two engine options, 1.0L petrol and 1.5L petrol, and multiple transmission options. Customers can choose the lively 6-speed manual transmission for more control or opt for the smooth 6-speed automatic and the advanced 7-speed DSG automatic for effortless convenience.
Table of Contents
Skoda Kushaq ARAI Mileage Figures
The official ARAI-approved Kushaq mileage for all variants is:
| Engine & Transmission | ARAI Mileage (km/l) |
| 1.0L TSI Manual | 19.76 km/l |
| 1.0L TSI (Auto) | 18.09 km/l |
| 1.5L TSI DSG (Auto) | 18.86 km/l |
Note: DSG refers to the dual-clutch automatic transmission.
Skoda Kushaq Real-World Mileage vs ARAI Mileage
While ARAI-certified mileage figures serve as a benchmark, the real-world efficiency of the Skoda Kushaq varies depending on usage conditions. In city driving, the 1.0L TSI manual typically delivers around 11.8 km/l, while the automatic averages 8.5 km/l.
On highways, efficiency improves, with both versions returning 14.3 km/l under steady cruising. The 1.5L TSI models, thanks to cylinder deactivation, can achieve fuel efficiency of up to 16.5 km/l on highways when driven efficiently.
Several factors contribute to the difference between ARAI and on-road performance:
- Traffic Conditions: Stop-and-go traffic, prolonged idling, and frequent gear changes reduce the city mileage of the Kushaq, while open highways allow it to approach its rated figures.
- Driving Habits: Quick acceleration, harsh braking, or maintaining high speeds increase fuel consumption, whereas a smoother, controlled style maximises efficiency.
- Load & AC Usage: Carrying additional passengers, heavy luggage, and continuous air-conditioner use put more strain on the engine, reducing mileage.
- Vehicle Maintenance: Regular servicing, clean filters, proper wheel alignment, and timely oil changes ensure the Kushaq remains fuel-efficient.
Overall, the Skoda Kushaq delivers a strong balance of performance and economy in its class. The 1.0L Petrol is marginally more efficient for city commutes, while the 1.5L Petrol offers smoother performance with nearly comparable efficiency on highways.
Skoda Kushaq Fuel Efficiency Comparison: 1.0L Petrol vs 1.5L Petrol
Compared to each other, the 1.0L Petrol engine of the Skoda Kushaq offers a slight advantage in fuel economy under optimal driving conditions, as its smaller displacement requires less fuel and performs efficiently during steady cruising.
The 1.5L Petrol TSI, however, emphasises stronger performance, smoother response, and consistent cruising power, especially on highways where the efficiency gap between the two engines is less noticeable.
In city traffic, frequent braking, stop-and-go movement, and prolonged idling impact both engines; however, the 1.5L generally consumes more fuel due to its higher displacement and power delivery.
Still, the 1.5L offers hassle-free overtaking ability, effortless drivability, and refinement, while the 1.0L remains the more economical choice for those seeking to minimise fuel costs in daily commutes.
Skoda Kushaq City Fuel Efficiency Comparison
In urban driving conditions, the Skoda Kushaq shows notable differences in fuel economy between its 1.0L Petrol and 1.5L Petrol TSI engines. The 1.0L averages about 11.5–11.8 km/l, while the 1.5L typically achieves around 8.5–8.9 km/l, giving the smaller engine a clear edge in congested city use.
Real-world experience suggests that the 1.0L Petrol is better suited for those who prioritise fuel savings during daily commutes. Meanwhile, the 1.5L Petrol TSI, although slightly less efficient, delivers smoother performance and stronger acceleration.
Key factors behind these mileage differences include:
- Engine Displacement and Efficiency: The 1.0L’s smaller displacement makes it inherently more fuel-efficient in city use. The 1.5L, despite featuring Active Cylinder Technology (ACT), consumes more fuel when operating under constant stop-start conditions, which prevents it from operating efficiently.
- Driving Conditions: In heavy traffic, the 1.0L performs better at low speeds with lighter load demands. The 1.5L, tuned for higher power, consumes more when frequent acceleration is needed.
- Idle and Low-Speed Performance: The 1.0L engine typically uses less fuel during prolonged idling and in slow-moving traffic. The 1.5L model maintains responsiveness, albeit at a slightly higher fuel cost.
- Maintenance and Wear Impact: A well-maintained 1.0L engine continues to deliver strong urban mileage. The 1.5L provides consistent power but may show reduced efficiency if servicing and the ACT function are not properly maintained.
- Driving Comfort vs Economy: The 1.5L prioritises smoother, effortless driving with higher torque, while the 1.0L appeals to economy-focused drivers who want to save fuel in city traffic. For long daily commutes in congested areas, the 1.0L stands out as the more efficient choice.
Skoda Kushaq Highway Fuel Efficiency Comparison
The Skoda Kushaq 1.0L Petrol trim strikes a good balance between fuel efficiency and driving control, making it ideal for regular commutes and long drives. In real-world highway conditions, it achieves approximately 14.3–16.5 km/l, slightly higher than its urban ratings.
On highways, the 1.5L achieves fuel economy of around 12.4–15.4 km/l, which is competitive for a more powerful engine but slightly lower than the 1.0L variant. While the difference is modest, highway travellers looking to save more on fuel may prefer the 1.0L, whereas drivers who value stronger performance lean towards the 1.5L.
Some of the main factors influencing highway mileage differences between the 1.0L and 1.5L Kushaq Petrol are:
- Cruising Efficiency: The 1.5L engine, with its ACT feature, can shut off two cylinders during light loads, improving efficiency at constant speeds. The 1.0L relies on a smaller displacement and lighter load to maintain steady highway mileage.
- Load and Air-Conditioning Impact: Carrying more passengers, luggage, or running the AC continuously affects both engines. The 1.5L engine adapts better under heavier loads due to its higher torque, while the 1.0L may experience larger mileage drops when pushed to its limits.
- Driving Style: Smooth and consistent driving helps both engines. However, the 1.0L may require more frequent gear changes and throttle inputs for overtaking, which can reduce its efficiency; in contrast, the 1.5L manages these situations with less stress.
- Terrain and Elevation: On slopes or hilly highways, the 1.5L’s more substantial torque provides better efficiency and control. The 1.0L can still manage but may consume more fuel when pushed harder.
- Fuel Stops and Convenience: The 1.0L’s higher efficiency means fewer refuels on relaxed drives, while the 1.5L balances between performance and economy, often making long highway runs more effortless.
- Overtaking and Speed Variations: Sudden accelerations or high-speed cruising consume more fuel in both engines. However, the 1.5L engine performs overtakes more efficiently without requiring high RPMs, whereas the 1.0L engine requires more brutal acceleration.
- Engine Stress and Longevity: The 1.5L engine typically runs at lower RPMs during highway cruising, reducing stress and ensuring smoother, longer drives. The 1.0L, if consistently pushed at higher RPMs, may show slightly higher fuel consumption and engine strain.
Skoda Kushaq Fuel Cost Comparison: 1.0L Petrol vs 1.5L Petrol
Choosing between the Skoda Kushaq’s 1.0L petrol and 1.5L Petrol Engines involves carefully considering fuel efficiency and ongoing expenses.
With an estimated average monthly driving distance of 1,500 km, this comparison helps you determine which variant offers better long-term value, enabling you to make an informed decision based on your budget and driving needs.
| Aspects | 1.0L Petrol | 1.5L Petrol |
| Monthly Running Distance | 1500 km | 1500 km |
| Monthly Fuel Use | 75.91 litres | 79.53 litres |
| Average Monthly Fuel Cost | ₹7,194 | ₹7,537 |
| Average Yearly Fuel Cost | ₹86,329 | ₹90,449 |
| 5-Year Fuel Cost | ₹4,31,645 | ₹4,52,243 |
Note: Fuel costs have been calculated considering an average petrol price of ₹94.77 per litre. Actual expenses may vary depending on location, fuel price fluctuations, and driving style.
Although both Skoda Kushaq petrol engines offer respectable fuel efficiency, the 1.5L tends to consume slightly more fuel in daily city driving. However, it delivers smoother performance and strong highway economy, which can balance long-term running costs.
Skoda Kushaq Mileage vs Competitors
When comparing mileage within its class, the Skoda Kushaq provides a balanced performance with both its 1.0L and 1.5L petrol engines. While some rivals may deliver slightly higher efficiency, the Kushaq stands out as a reliable choice, offering consistent real-world fuel economy and steady performance in both city and highway driving.
Here’s a breakdown of its official mileage figures:
| Model | 1.0 Petrol Mileage (km/l) | 1.5L Petrol Mileage (km/l) |
| Skoda Kushaq | 19.76 km/l | 18.86 km/l |
| Hyundai Creta | Data not found | 17.4 km/l |
| Kia Seltos | Not Available | 17.7 km/l |
| Volkswagen Taigun | 19.89 km/l | 18.61 km/l |
Overall, the Skoda Kushaq offers impressive fuel efficiency, with the 1.5L Petrol Engine providing slightly better mileage than the 1.0L Petrol Engine.
While it may not be the best in its class, it strikes a good balance between performance and operating costs, making it a dependable choice for daily driving.
Summary
The Skoda Kushaq offers both a 1.0L and a 1.5L petrol engine, each catering to different driving needs. When it comes to operating costs, the 1.0L variant appeals to fuel-conscious buyers who primarily drive in urban settings. The 1.5L, however, offers more power and refinement for highway runs and is the preferred choice for those seeking a spirited driving experience.
FAQs about Skoda Kushaq Mileage Comparison
Q. What is the mileage difference between the Skoda Kushaq 1.0L and 1.5L petrol variants?
The 1.0L turbo petrol usually delivers slightly better mileage in city driving, while the 1.5L turbo petrol performs better on highways. ARAI-tested figures show 19.76 km/l for the 1.0L and 18.86 km/l for the 1.5L, but real-world results depend on driving style and conditions.
Q. Which Skoda Kushaq petrol variant is more fuel-efficient for city driving?
In stop-and-go city traffic, the 1.0L turbo petrol is usually more fuel-efficient when driven carefully. The 1.5L offers stronger performance but may consume slightly more fuel with repeated acceleration and braking in urban conditions.
Q. Is the Skoda Kushaq 1.5L petrol worth the higher fuel cost?
The 1.5L turbo petrol version is typically more powerful and offers effortless highway performance, with cylinder deactivation technology helping to enhance efficiency. Although fuel costs may be marginally higher than those of the 1.0L in city use, the added power and refinement often justify the choice for many buyers.
Q. How do running costs compare between the Skoda Kushaq 1.0L and 1.5L petrol variants?
The 1.0L turbo petrol is generally more affordable to run in heavy urban traffic due to its better mileage. The 1.5L turbo petrol, however, offers stronger performance and better long-distance efficiency, making it more suitable for mixed or highway-focused usage.
Q. Which Skoda Kushaq petrol variant should I choose for long-distance driving?
For long highway trips, the 1.5L turbo petrol is better because it offers stronger acceleration, smoother cruising, and steady efficiency at higher speeds. The 1.0L can manage highways too, but it requires more effort during overtakes and long climbs.
