The MG Astor and the Hyundai Creta are compact SUVs targeted at customers looking for a family vehicle with advanced features and driving convenience. In 2026, the Astor has taken the easier mechanical route, offering only one version of a 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine with both manual and CVT transmissions. The Creta offers more engine options, and buyers can choose between a naturally aspirated petrol engine, a turbo petrol engine, and a 1.5-litre diesel engine.
This difference in powertrain choice also makes their mileage comparison interesting. The Astor is known more for its premium cabin, safety equipment, and ride quality than class-leading fuel economy. The Creta, on the other hand, offers better claimed efficiency with its regular petrol engine and also gives high-running buyers the option of a diesel. In real-world automatic testing, the Creta 1.5 IVT also returns noticeably better mileage than the Astor CVT. Here, we compare their specifications, claimed mileage, real-world efficiency, fuel costs, and prices.
MG Astor vs Hyundai Creta Specs
The table below highlights the major specifications of the MG Astor and Hyundai Creta:
| Specification | MG Astor | Hyundai Creta |
| Regular petrol engine | 1.5-litre VTi-TECH Petrol | 1.5-litre MPi Petrol |
| Turbo-petrol engine | – | 1.5-litre Turbo GDi Petrol |
| Diesel engine | – | 1.5-litre CRDi Diesel |
| Displacement | 1498 cc | 1497 cc / 1482 cc / 1493 cc |
| Power | 110 PS | 115 PS / 160 PS / 116 PS |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 143.8 Nm / 253 Nm / 250 Nm |
| Transmission | 5-speed MT, 8-step CVT | 6-speed MT, IVT, 7-speed DCT, 6-speed AT |
| Drive layout | Front Wheel Drive | Front Wheel Drive |
| Fuel tank capacity | 48 litres | 50 litres |
Since both cars use 1.5-litre engines, comparing fuel efficiency between them is more meaningful than comparing the MG with the turbo version of the Creta. The real difference comes down to the cars’ weight, how the transmission works, and mobility considerations. Hence, customers should not assume cars weigh the same. Even if the cars have the same engine, this doesn’t guarantee that they will consume the same amount of fuel.
The Astor’s 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol produces 110 PS and 144 Nm and can be paired with either a 5-speed manual or an 8-step CVT. Its output is close to the Creta 1.5 petrol, which makes 115 PS and 143.8 Nm. Both are naturally aspirated four-cylinder engines designed for smooth, predictable power delivery.
The Creta has a bigger lineup of engines and mechanical specifications. Its 1.5-litre turbo-petrol engine generates 160 PS and 253 Nm of torque, while the 1.5-litre diesel engine develops 116 PS and 250 Nm of torque. The tank capacity of the Astor is less than that of the Creta, as it has a 48-litre tank as compared to the Creta’s 50-litre tank.
Also Read: MG Astor Mileage Comparison: Manual vs Automatic
MG Astor vs Hyundai Creta: ARAI Mileage Figures
The claimed mileage figures give the Creta a clear advantage. The Astor manual is rated at 15.43 km/l, while its CVT is rated at 14.82 km/l. The Creta 1.5 petrol manual claims 17.4 km/l, and the IVT automatic is rated slightly higher at 17.7 km/l.
| Engine & Transmission | MG Astor – ARAI Mileage | Hyundai Creta – ARAI Mileage |
| 1.5 Petrol Manual | 15.43 km/l | 17.4 km/l |
| 1.5 Petrol Automatic | 14.82 km/l CVT | 17.7 km/l IVT |
| 1.5 Turbo Petrol DCT | – | 18.4 km/l |
| 1.5 Diesel Manual | – | 21.8 km/l |
| 1.5 Diesel Automatic | – | 19.1 km/l |
Among the normally aspirated petrol engines together with manual transmission, the Creta has an advantage of approximately 2 km/l over the Astor. The difference is even bigger in the automatic versions, since the Creta IVT offers nearly 3 km/l more than the Astor CVT.
The Creta’s other engines extend this advantage. Its turbo-petrol DCT claims 18.4 km/l despite offering far stronger performance than the Astor, while the diesel manual is rated at 21.8 km/l. Overall, the Creta has the stronger claimed-mileage case.
MG Astor vs Hyundai Creta: Real World Fuel-Efficiency
Concrete real-world mileage is more revealing. Independent assessments of the mileage of the 1.5-litre petrol automatic cars are useful for comparisons.
The MG Astor CVT returned 8.3 km/l in city conditions and 10.4 km/l on the highway, for an average of around 9.3 km/l. The Hyundai Creta IVT returned 11.2 km/l in the city and 15 km/l on the highway, averaging around 13.1 km/l.
| Driving Condition | MG Astor 1.5 CVT | Hyundai Creta 1.5 IVT |
| City | 8.3 km/l | 11.2 km/l |
| Highway | 10.4 km/l | 15.0 km/l |
| Average | 9.3 km/l | 13.1 km/l |
| Fuel tank capacity | 48 litres | 50 litres |
| Approx. range based on average | 446 km | 655 km |
The gap is significant, especially on the highway. Creta’s bigger tank gives it a longer real-life mileage.
One of the main reasons for the Astor’s lower mileage is its weight. The tested CVT weighs around 1349 kg, making it one of the heavier petrol SUVs in its class. Its 1.5-litre engine has to move more mass, particularly during repeated acceleration in city traffic, which increases fuel consumption.
The Creta 1.5 IVT is more efficient in terms of fuel consumption. Options like auto start-stop eliminate waiting time, and the new IVT setting lets the engine reach its optimal mode much faster. Another run delivered 11.16 km/l in the city and 15.77 km/l on the highway, confirming the real-world fuel-consumption trend on this stretch of road.
The Astor still offers smooth city drivability, but buyers covering long distances will notice the fuel-cost difference more clearly.
Creta’s diesel versions are also a good option for those who drive a lot and wish to save on fuel expenses, even if Astor can’t compete directly in this regard. The turbo petrol Creta delivers much better acceleration than both naturally aspirated petrol SUVs and, at the same time, doesn’t fall back on fuel savings like the Astor.
Also Read: Complete Guide to Buying an MG Astor
MG Astor vs Hyundai Creta: Fuel Cost Comparison
Let us compare fuel expenses assuming both petrol automatic SUVs travel around 1500 km every month. Petrol is priced at approximately ₹112.04 per litre in Pune. The calculations use the average real-world figures of 9.3 km/l for the Astor CVT and 13.1 km/l for the Creta IVT.
| Cost Parameter | MG Astor CVT | Hyundai Creta IVT |
| Monthly Running | 1500 km | 1500 km |
| Average Real-World Mileage | 9.3 km/l | 13.1 km/l |
| Monthly Fuel Use | 161.29 litres | 114.50 litres |
| Average Monthly Fuel Cost | ₹18,071 | ₹12,829 |
| Average Yearly Fuel Cost | ₹2.17 lakh | ₹1.54 lakh |
| 5-Year Fuel Cost | ₹10.84 lakh | ₹7.70 lakh |
Interestingly, assuming the mileage of 1500 kilometres a month, the CVT version of Astor consumes 47 litres of petrol more than the IVT version of Creta. This means a difference of around ₹5200 a month. Within a year, the gap will be over ₹62000, while within five years it may exceed ₹3 lakh if the mileage and prices remain the same.
Actual costs will vary with traffic, driving style, and highway use, but the Creta still retains a clear running-cost advantage.
This difference may not matter for occasional users. For a person travelling 500-700 km per month, the savings would not be significant in reality compared to a person driving 1500-2000 km. The more a vehicle is used, the more relevant the Creta’s advantage becomes when discussing total ownership costs.
MG Astor vs Hyundai Creta Price
| Model | Variant Range | Approx. Ex-Showroom Price |
| MG Astor | Sprint to Savvy Pro | ₹9.79 lakh to ₹15.30 lakh |
| Hyundai Creta | E to Knight | ₹10.91 lakh to ₹20.11 lakh |
The Astor has a significant pricing advantage at both ends of the spectrum. The Astor’s entry price is more than ₹1 lakh lower than the Creta’s, and even its highest variants are still considerably cheaper than the top Creta. Thus, introducing the Astor at such a low price makes it possible to offset its higher fuel costs, especially for customers with a limited annual driving distance.
The Creta costs more at the top end because it offers more engines, gearboxes, and premium variants. Buyers who drive relatively little may therefore find the Astor’s lower purchase price attractive, while those covering high yearly distances should pay closer attention to the Creta’s fuel savings.
Summary
In terms of comfort, both the MG Astor and Hyundai Creta are midsize SUVs; however, they have different fuel-efficiency characteristics. The Astor is now powered by a single 1.5-litre petrol engine, which is said to deliver fuel efficiency of 15.43 km/l (manual version) and 14.82 km/l (CVT version). The 1.5 petrol engine of the Creta, for example, is claimed to deliver 17.4 km/l when paired with a manual transmission, while an automated version promises an even better 17.7 km/l.
Real-world automatic testing gives the Creta an even stronger advantage. The Creta IVT averaged around 13.1 km/l compared with about 9.3 km/l for the Astor CVT. This can create a substantial long-term fuel-cost difference for buyers covering 1500 km or more every month. Therefore, purely from a mileage and running-cost perspective, the Hyundai Creta is the clear winner. The Astor’s case is stronger for buyers who value its lower purchase price, premium cabin, and equipment more than outright fuel economy.
Also Read: Complete Guide on Buying a Hyundai Creta
FAQs
Q. MG Astor vs Hyundai Creta: Which car gives better real-world mileage?
The Hyundai Creta gives significantly better real-world mileage. In comparable petrol-automatic testing, the Creta averaged around 13.1 km/l, while the MG Astor CVT averaged around 9.3 km/l.
Q. What is the claimed mileage of the MG Astor?
The MG Astor 1.5-litre petrol manual is rated at 15.43 km/l, while the CVT automatic claims around 14.82 km/l.
Q. What is the claimed mileage of the Hyundai Creta?
The Creta 1.5 petrol manual claims 17.4 km/l and the IVT 17.7 km/l. The turbo-petrol DCT is rated at 18.4 km/l, while the diesel manual claims up to 21.8 km/l.
Q. Which gives better highway mileage, MG Astor or Hyundai Creta?
The Creta has the clear advantage. In the comparable automatic tests, the Creta returned around 15 km/l on the highway compared with approximately 10.4 km/l for the Astor.
Q. Which is cheaper to run, MG Astor or Hyundai Creta?
The Hyundai Creta is cheaper to run based on real-world petrol mileage. The Astor costs less to purchase, but buyers with high monthly running costs could recover part of the Creta’s higher purchase price through lower fuel expenses.
