The Hyundai Verna is one of the sleekest and most feature-loaded sedans out there in the mid-size segment, which is famous for its aggressive looks, luxurious interiors, and unparalleled blend of comfort and performance. Customers can choose between the silky-smooth 1.5-litre naturally aspirated petrol engine or the sportier 1.5-litre turbo-petrol engine based on their driving style and usage.
While the SX with the 1.5 petrol IVT (CVT) transmission will find favour with drivers who seek comfort, the SX Turbo model with the 1.5 turbo-petrol engine and DCT transmission is for those who want an exciting drive.
In this guide, we’ll focus on one of the most crucial factors for sedan buyers: mileage. We will examine official ARAI mileage figures and real-world conditions and compare which version offers the better balance between performance, running costs, and day-to-day usability.
Table of Contents
Hyundai Verna ARAI Mileage Figures
Official ARAI-certified mileage for the Hyundai Verna across all engine and transmission options is:
| Engine & Transmission | ARAI Mileage (km/l) |
| Petrol – Automatic | 19.6 kmpl |
| Turbo Petrol – Automatic | 20.6 kmpl |
Hyundai Verna Real-World Mileage vs ARAI Mileage
Though ARAI mileage ratings are achieved under controlled test conditions, real-world driving often delivers lower figures. On highways, both versions deliver closer to their certified mileage when driven at steady speeds.
In real life, several factors cause the difference between ARAI and real-world mileage, such as:
- Driving Style: Excessive acceleration, continuous braking, and aggressive throttle usage consume more petrol. Smooth and consistent driving provides mileage closer to the ARAI figures, enabling drivers to extract more efficiency out of both engines.
- Traffic Conditions: City stop-and-go traffic and random slowdowns decrease fuel efficiency. High-congestion long commutes impact the turbo DCT more significantly than the IVT, as its rapid shifting constantly compensates for the traffic.
- Load and Accessories: Carrying passengers, heavy luggage, or roof racks increases drag and weight, forcing the engine to consume more fuel. Regular highway travellers with lighter loads will notice better stability in mileage figures.
- Usage of Air Conditioning: Running the AC puts an extra load on the engine, which reduces mileage noticeably. In peak summers, drivers may see an even steeper drop, especially during short city commutes.
- Road and Weather Conditions: Bad roads, driving uphill, or extremely hot weather cause the engine to consume more petrol. Smooth roads at moderate temperatures enable the Verna to nearly reach its tested marks.
- Tyre Pressure and Servicing: Inaccurately inflated tyres or improper servicing decrease efficiency over a well-serviced vehicle. Regular checks and proper servicing will improve mileage on a daily basis by a significant amount.
Hyundai Verna Fuel Efficiency Comparison: Petrol vs Turbo Petrol
In terms of mileage, the Hyundai Verna petrol and turbo-petrol variants attract different types of drivers. The petrol IVT variant offers a balance of performance and efficiency and is best for those who are prepared to compromise some smoothness and comfort on the city roads in exchange for better mileage, especially in stop-and-go traffic.
Meanwhile, the turbo-petrol variant offers a sportier experience and quicker acceleration, which will attract driving enthusiasts who are prepared to trade in some fuel efficiency for enhanced performance.
Hyundai Verna City Fuel Efficiency Comparison
In urban driving, petrol IVT models offer smooth performance and reasonable mileage, although frequent halts and traffic can increase fuel consumption. The turbo DCT versions, while fun to drive, generally consume slightly more fuel in stop-and-go conditions.
The main factors for the disparity are
- Traffic & Idling: Turbo engines lose efficiency more significantly in stop-and-go traffic than the petrol IVT. As CVTs are smoother at low speeds, the IVT is steadier in fuel consumption.
- Engine Load & Combustion: Turbo engines provide superior performance but consume more fuel under abrupt power demands. The IVT design, however, keeps revs in check; thus, it is more trustworthy under city conditions.
- Vehicle Load & AC Usage: Both lose efficiency through maximum passenger capacity and constant AC usage, but the IVT is more suitable for driving in city conditions. It is therefore more suitable for families to drive daily.
- Thermal Efficiency: Turbo engines experience more stress from repeated stop-start usage, whereas the IVT configuration is more consistent. The smooth gear shifting of the IVT lessens engine stress during traffic-clogged conditions.
- Fuel Properties: The high-compression performance tuning of the turbo is more power-oriented, while the base petrol IVT is more economy-oriented. Customers who desire long-term cost savings will find the IVT more reliable in city driving.
Hyundai Verna Highway Fuel Efficiency Comparison
Progressive braking and gradual acceleration also help in prolonging highway fuel efficiency. The turbo-petrol DCT is fantastic but has the tendency to consume more fuel in instant overtake situations. On the other hand, the petrol IVT variants are more consistent with mileage.
The causes of inconsistency in fuel efficiency are:
- Steady Speed: Both engines perform closer to ARAI figures at steady cruising speeds. The turbo especially rewards disciplined highway driving with near-claimed efficiency.
- Driving Style: Smooth acceleration and steady speed cruising provide the best mileage; hard passing reduces the turbo engine’s fuel efficiency more severely. Carefree drivers will find the benefit of both models virtually indistinguishable.
- Altitude & Terrain: On steep slopes, the turbo boasts better power delivery, but it comes with greater fuel consumption.
- Fuel Availability & Route Planning: As both are petrol engines, fuel availability is never an issue on long road journeys. This makes highway runs stress-free compared to cars that rely on less common fuel types.
Hyundai Verna Fuel Cost Comparison: Petrol vs Turbo Petrol
Understanding fuel costs is essential when deciding between the petrol and turbo petrol variants of the Hyundai Verna. Let’s compare the running expenses based on a typical monthly driving of 1500 km and a few other aspects to help you gauge which option fits your budget better.
| Aspects | Petrol | Turbo Petrol |
| Monthly Running Distance | 1500 km | 1500 km |
| Monthly Fuel Use | Approx. 50 liters | Approx. 65 liters |
| Average Monthly Fuel Cost | ₹4,000* | ₹5,200* |
| Average Yearly Fuel Cost | ₹48,000* | ₹62,400* |
| 5-Year Fuel Cost | ₹2,40,000* | ₹3,12,000* |
Note: Fuel expense is approximated using the average petrol price of ₹80/litre. Actual fuel costs will vary regionally and will be based on fluctuations in fuel prices. The standard petrol variant offers lower running costs, making it more economical for high-mileage users, while the turbo petrol variant provides added power and driving thrill at a higher fuel expense.
Hyundai Verna Mileage vs Competitors
Comparing the Hyundai Verna’s mileage with that of its closest rivals gives a clearer picture of where it stands in terms of fuel efficiency. Here’s a look at the official ARAI mileage figures for the popular mid-size sedans in this segment:
| Model | Petrol Mileage (kmpl) |
| Hyundai Verna | 19.6 – 20.6 kmpl |
| Honda City | 17.8 kmpl |
| Skoda Slavia | 20.32 kmpl |
| Maruti Suzuki Ciaz | 20.65 kmpl |
The Hyundai Verna sits competitively in the segment, with its turbo-petrol variant claiming one of the highest mileage figures. While rivals like the Ciaz and Slavia are strong on efficiency, the Verna manages to strike a balance between sporty performance and economy, which is a key highlight of its offering.
Summary
To sum up, the Hyundai Verna proves itself as a balanced choice in the mid-size sedan segment, offering impressive mileage without compromising on performance or features. Its petrol IVT variant is ideal for buyers who prioritise smooth city driving and better fuel efficiency, while the turbo-petrol DCT is designed for enthusiasts seeking quicker acceleration and a sportier drive.
Overall, the Hyundai Verna strikes the right middle ground between performance, economy, and premium appeal, making it a compelling choice for those who want both driving excitement and sensible ownership costs in one package.
FAQs About Hyundai Verna Mileage Comparison
Q. Is the Hyundai Verna more fuel-efficient than its competitors?
The Hyundai Verna offers up to 20.6 km/l mileage in its turbo-petrol variant, one of the highest mileage figures in its segment. It competes with the Skoda Slavia, Honda City, and Maruti Suzuki Ciaz on the basis of mileage.
Q. Which model of Hyundai Verna offers the highest mileage?
The Verna turbo-petrol DCT offers the maximum mileage of 20.6 km/l (as rated by ARAI). The base petrol IVT model is not far behind at 19.6 km/l and is a good trade-off between efficiency and smoothness.
Q. Is the Verna turbo-petrol engine thirstier in city traffic?
Yes, as is the case with most turbo engines, the Verna’s turbo-petrol remains marginally less efficient in city stop-go compared to highway cruising. But there’s still room for good driving to yield respectable figures.
Q. How does the Verna’s fuel cost stack up compared to rivals?
The fuel costs of the Verna are marginally higher than the Ciaz but similar to the Slavia and Virtus. The difference does not make a significant long-term impact, as the Verna provides better performance and features.
Q. Is the Hyundai Verna ideal for road trips?
Yes, the Verna’s perky engines, roomy interior, and smooth ride make it a good highway contender. Its fuel-economy estimates are respectable enough to keep long-term expenses on par with its closest competitors.
