The Hyundai i20 is one of India’s most popular premium hatchbacks, known for its stylish design, comfortable cabin, and feature-packed interiors. Among its various variants, the petrol and turbo petrol models are the most sought-after, offering a balance of performance, fuel efficiency, and driving enjoyment.
The standard 1.2-litre petrol engine delivers smooth performance ideal for city commuting, while the 1.0-litre turbo petrol variant offers a sportier drive with quicker acceleration and more responsive handling.
The Hyundai i20 petrol variant offers excellent mileage, making it suitable for daily city use. Meanwhile, the turbo petrol variant, although slightly thirstier, provides higher performance without a significant compromise on fuel economy.
In this comparison, we’ll examine the official ARAI mileage figures for both engines and contrast them with real-world performance, helping you determine which variant strikes the best balance between running costs and driving experience.
Table of Contents
Hyundai i20 ARAI Mileage Figures
Official ARAI-certified mileage for the Hyundai i20 across all engine and transmission options is:
| Engine & Transmission | ARAI Mileage (kmpl) |
| Petrol – Automatic | 20 kmpl |
| Petrol – Manual | 16 kmpl |
Hyundai i20 Real-World Mileage vs ARAI Mileage
While ARAI mileage figures serve as a standard reference, they are measured under controlled conditions and may differ from actual real-world driving. On city roads, the Hyundai i20 petrol manual achieves a fuel efficiency of around 17.21 kmpl, whereas the automatic petrol variant averages 15.6 kmpl.
Several factors influence the gap between ARAI ratings and actual mileage:
- Driving Habits: Aggressive acceleration, frequent braking, and high-speed driving reduce fuel efficiency.
- Traffic Conditions: Stop-and-go city traffic lowers mileage compared to smooth, open highway driving.
- Load & Air-Conditioner Use: Carrying extra passengers or heavy luggage, along with prolonged AC usage, increases fuel consumption.
- Vehicle Maintenance: Regular servicing, clean air filters, and correct tyre pressure ensure optimal fuel efficiency.
Overall, the real-world mileage of the Hyundai i20 petrol and turbo petrol variants remains competitive within the hatchback segment. For drivers who prioritise fuel efficiency without compromising on performance, the standard petrol is ideal, while the turbo petrol strikes a balance between spirited driving and reasonable fuel economy.
Hyundai i20 Fuel Efficiency Comparison: Petrol vs Turbo Petrol
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Hyundai i20’s petrol and turbo petrol variants cater to different driving needs. The standard petrol model strikes a balance between performance and fuel economy, making it suitable for daily commuting.
Meanwhile, the turbo petrol variant delivers more power, which can slightly impact mileage. In real-world city driving, the difference becomes noticeable, especially in stop-and-go traffic, where the turbo engine tends to consume more fuel compared to the regular petrol version.
Hyundai i20 City Fuel Efficiency Comparison
When driving in city conditions, the Hyundai i20 petrol variant generally delivers decent fuel efficiency, but frequent stops and starts in congested traffic can increase fuel consumption.
According to the real-world mileage, manual petrol variants tend to be more fuel-efficient than automatic ones due to the torque converter in the automatic transmission, which slightly reduces efficiency.
On the other hand, the turbo petrol variant, while offering higher performance, consumes more fuel during stop-and-go traffic because of its more powerful engine setup. The key reasons for the differences in city mileage between the two variants include:
- Engine Characteristics: The turbocharged petrol engine is tuned for higher power output, which is ideal for quick acceleration but results in slightly higher fuel consumption during city driving. The regular petrol engine, being less aggressive, maintains more consistent fuel efficiency under similar conditions.
- Driving Conditions: Stop-and-go traffic in urban areas demands sudden bursts of power, which turbo engines require more fuel for, whereas naturally aspirated petrol engines handle low-speed crawling more efficiently.
- Idle and Low-Speed Efficiency: During heavy traffic with frequent idling, the standard petrol engine consumes less fuel compared to the turbocharged petrol engine, giving it an edge in city mileage.
- Heat and Engine Load Management: Turbo engines tend to generate more heat under constant stop-start conditions, which slightly affects fuel efficiency. In contrast, the standard petrol engine maintains more stable operating temperatures, helping it achieve better overall mileage in urban traffic.
Hyundai i20 Highway Fuel Efficiency Comparison
On highways, the Hyundai i20 petrol variants generally offer better fuel economy during steady cruising and smooth braking. Manual petrol models tend to deliver higher mileage compared to automatic versions, as evidenced by real-world mileage, because power is transmitted more directly to the wheels.
Turbo petrol models, while providing more power, may consume slightly more fuel under heavy acceleration or overtaking situations. Key factors affecting highway mileage between petrol and turbo petrol variants include:
- Cruising Efficiency: Regular petrol engines are usually more efficient at consistent high speeds. Turbo petrol engines provide higher performance but may slightly lag in fuel efficiency during extended highway drives, especially under load.
- Load and Air-Conditioning Impact: Carrying multiple passengers or luggage can reduce fuel efficiency in both variants. Continuous use of air conditioning affects turbocharged petrol engines marginally more due to the added engine load.
- Driving Style: Smooth acceleration and maintaining a steady speed are crucial for optimal mileage in both petrol and turbo petrol models. Frequent hard braking or rapid acceleration will lower overall fuel efficiency.
- Terrain and Elevation: Uphill or mountainous routes have a different impact on fuel consumption. Petrol engines tend to maintain better efficiency on slopes, whereas turbocharged petrol engines can handle gradients more effortlessly but may consume slightly more fuel in the process.
- Fuel Stops and Convenience: During long drives, the availability of petrol stations influences overall efficiency. While both variants have widespread fuel availability, planning refuelling stops for more extended trips can affect real-world mileage.
Hyundai i20 Fuel Cost Comparison: Petrol vs Turbo Petrol
When choosing between the petrol and turbo petrol variants of the Hyundai i20, understanding fuel efficiency and running costs is crucial. Let’s compare these variants based on typical monthly driving of 1,500 km to help you determine which option aligns better with your budget.
| Aspects | Petrol | Turbo Petrol |
| Monthly Running Distance | 1500 km | 1500 km |
| Monthly Fuel Use | Approx. 75 litres | Approx. 95 litres |
| Average Monthly Fuel Cost | ₹7,108* | ₹9,003* |
| Average Yearly Fuel Cost | ₹85,293* | ₹1,08,036* |
| 5-Year Fuel Cost | ₹4,26,465* | ₹5,40,180* |
Note: Fuel costs are estimated based on an average petrol price of ₹94.77 per litre. Actual expenses may vary depending on your location and changes in fuel prices. The turbo petrol variant, while offering enhanced performance, generally consumes slightly more fuel than the standard petrol version.
Choosing the regular petrol model can lead to lower running costs over time, particularly for drivers who regularly cover long distances.
Hyundai i20 Mileage vs Competitors
When evaluating the Hyundai i20’s fuel efficiency, it’s essential to consider both the standard petrol and turbo-petrol variants. Here’s a breakdown of their official mileage figures:
| Model | Petrol Mileage (kmpl) |
| Hyundai i20 | 16-20 kmpl |
| Tata Altroz | 19.33 kmpl |
| Hyundai i20 N-Line | 20.00 kmpl |
| Maruti Suzuki Baleno | 22.35 kmpl |
| Toyota Glanza | 22.35 kmpl |
The Hyundai i20 turbo petrol variant offers slightly lower mileage compared to the standard petrol version, making it more fuel-efficient for daily commuting.
Summary
The Hyundai i20 turbo petrol variant delivers more power and a spirited driving experience, making it ideal for those who prioritise performance and city highway driving. On the other hand, the regular petrol model excels in fuel efficiency and lower running costs, making it a practical choice for daily commuters and budget-conscious users.
Choosing between the petrol and turbo petrol variants ultimately depends on your driving style, daily mileage, and preference for either fuel economy or performance.
FAQs about Hyundai i20 Mileage Comparison
Q. What is the mileage difference between the Hyundai i20 petrol and turbo petrol variants?
The standard petrol Hyundai i20 offers higher fuel efficiency, whereas the turbo petrol variant delivers slightly lower mileage, due to its higher power output and performance-oriented tuning.
Q. Which Hyundai i20 variant is more fuel-efficient for city driving?
For city commutes, the regular petrol Hyundai i20 is more fuel-efficient. Its lighter engine and simpler tuning provide better mileage in stop-and-go traffic compared to the turbo petrol variant, which consumes more fuel under frequent acceleration.
Q. Is the turbo petrol variant worth the extra fuel cost?
The turbo petrol Hyundai i20 offers enhanced performance and faster acceleration, making it ideal for highway driving. While its fuel consumption is slightly higher, the added driving comfort and responsiveness can justify the extra fuel cost for performance-focused drivers.
Q. How do running costs compare between petrol and turbo petrol i20?
The regular i20 petrol has lower running costs due to its better fuel efficiency and slightly cheaper maintenance. The turbo petrol costs more to run, especially for frequent city driving, but provides better performance and a sportier driving experience.
Q. Which Hyundai i20 variant should I choose for long-distance driving?
For long-distance travel, the turbo-petrol Hyundai i20 is suitable due to its higher power and smoother highway performance. However, if minimising fuel expenses is the priority, the regular petrol variant is still a practical and efficient choice.
