Volkswagen Polo Mileage Comparison: Petrol (MPI) vs Petrol (TSI)

The Volkswagen Polo, even though it has exited the Indian market, remains a legend among enthusiasts and practical buyers. Its ageless appeal, robust build quality, and brilliant drivability made it a yardstick in the premium hatch segment. Though the legacy of the car has been determined by various factors, among them has always been a most important consideration of the buyers—both new and used—being the engine variants offered by the Polo. In the Polo’s final years of sales in India, the car was available with two petrol engines: the frugal 1.0-litre MPI (Multi-Point Injection) and the sporty 1.0-litre TSI (Turbocharged Stratified Injection).

This 2025 guide takes an in-depth look at the real-world mileage of these two engines. We separate the official ARAI data from reality to provide a clear understanding of the lifestyle implications of each variant in everyday driving conditions. We’ll compare the cost of running, performance variation, and overall ownership to help you choose the ideal variant that best suits your lifestyle. As a first-time buyer seeking a trustworthy hatchback or an enthusiast wanting a fun ride, knowing the true character of each engine paves the way to an enjoyable ownership life.

The Engines: MPI vs. TSI Explained

Before we get into the figures, we need to understand the fundamental characteristic difference of these two 1.0-litre, three-cylinder engines. They share the same displacement and number of cylinders but have substantially different character and performance.

1.0-litre MPI (Naturally Aspirated)

This is the more conventional of the two. A naturally aspirated engine has air drawn into its cylinders by atmospheric pressure alone. It is a simpler mechanical engine more likely to prove dependable and economical to keep running. In the Polo, the MPI was set up with an eye to economy and smooth, predictable power delivery, and was ideal for city running and calm motoring. Its power and torque figures are lower, but because of its linear power band, it is very drivable.

1.0-litre TSI (Turbocharged)

This was the flagship of the Polo range. The TSI engine employed a turbocharger to compress more air into the combustion chamber. This resulted in more powerful combustion and a significant increase in power and torque without increasing the engine’s displacement. Turbocharged engines are characterized by their “lag” at lower RPMs before the turbo spools up, and then a rush of power. The Polo TSI, with its sporty performance, was an enthusiast’s dream come true. Available either with a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed torque converter automatic, the Polo TSI promised an exhilarating drive experience.

The Official Numbers: ARAI-Claimed Mileage

The ARAI (Automotive Research Association of India) offers a standardized mileage under controlled lab conditions. Though these are handy in a straightforward comparison, they have little applicability to everyday driving.

• Polo 1.0 MPI Manual: 17.74 kmpl
• Polo 1.0 TSI Manual: 18.78 kmpl
• Polo 1.0 TSI Automatic (TC): 16.47 km/l

Notably, the ARAI ratings indicate that the more powerful TSI engine is only marginally less efficient than the MPI, and the gap is more significant in the case of the automatic version. This goes to prove the engineering prowess of the TSI engine, which has the capability of delivering power and respectable mileage at the same time. But we’ll come to the reality of road behavior shortly.

Real-World Polo Mileage: What Owners Experience

On the road, the story of Polo’s mileage is far more nuanced. Driving style, traffic, and road conditions all play a massive role.

Polo 1.0-litre MPI (Manual)

• City: Mileage should be about 12–14 km/l.In stop-and-go, bumper-to-bumper traffic, this decrease is even more pronounced, but due to the straightforward character of the MPI engine, extreme changes are less likely to occur. With the linear delivery of power from the engine, no revving of the engine is required to support the acceleration of traffic flow.
• Highway: At light foot and cruising at 90-100 km/h on the open road, the MPI produces an impressive 16–17 km/l. However, due to lower torque, more frequent downshifting when overtaking occurs, which impacts economy.
• Combined Average: A driver with a mix of city and highway usage can expect a realistic average of around 14–15 km/l.

Polo 1.0-litre TSI (Manual & Automatic)

• City: Here, the mileage of TSI is most sensitive. Under heavy city traffic and frequent stop-and-go traffic, the mileage drops to 11–13 km/l. The turbocharger requires more fuel to operate, and the engine’s spirited nature encourages the driver to drive more aggressively, resulting in increased fuel consumption.
• Highway: Here lies the sweet spot of the TSI. With light foot and in its best torque band, the TSI is remarkably economical, easily achieving 17–19 km/l.. The 6th gear of the manual further ensures a low RPM and hence noticeably improves mileage. The auto variant, too, does an impressive job on the highway and records around 15-17 km/l of mileage.
• Combined Average: For a combined driving pattern, the owner of a Polo TSI has a realistic average of 15-16 km/litre. The secret is a disciplined style of driving; aggressive driving reduces the mileage substantially.

It is important to keep in mind the “dual personality” of the TSI engine. Driven smoothly, it is very economical in fuel, competing with or even exceeding the MPI on highways. However, as soon as you access the engine’s performance potential, the gas level will drop significantly faster.

Performance and Driving Experience: The Real Difference

While fuel economy is a major factor, the driving experience is where the two engines truly diverge.

Polo 1.0 MPI

This mill produces an unpretentious 75.10 bhp and 95 Nm of torque. It is a workhorse, built to be frugal and faithful. Power availability is linear, and thus a stress-free vehicle when operating on a daily city duty cycle. Accelerating on the highway requires some thinking ahead and aggressive downshifting, but if one is the type of driver who demands a smooth and calm ride, then the MPI does the trick. The 5-speed manual transmission is smooth, featuring a light clutch, making it comfortable in traffic.

Polo 1.0 TSI

The TSI engine is an entirely different animal, with a spirited 108 bhp and a robust 175 nm of torque. This is an enthusiast’s car! The turbo starts to come into effect around 2000 RPM, and power delivery occurs with an excellent, solid thrust that makes overtaking an absolute cinch and cruising on highways an absolute joyride! The 6-speed manual gearbox itself is a delight to use, and the clutch is lighter and progressive than anticipated! The 6-speed automatic (torque converter) itself is adequately calibrated and provides smooth shifts and good response to the driver! This combination of power and performance was why the Polo TSI was ever a legend!

The Financial Breakdown: Running Costs and Break-Even

Given the differences in mileage, what do the running costs look like? Let’s use an approximate petrol price of ₹94.77 per liter (mid-2025).

• Cost per Km (Based on Real-World Average):
  • Polo 1.0 MPI (Manual): ₹94.77 / 14.72 km/l = ₹6.44 per km
  • Polo 1.0 TSI (Manual): ₹94.77 / 15.58 km/l = ₹6.08 per km

The difference in the cost of operating them is very minimal. The MPI does have a slight edge, but it’s not a tremendous difference. The cost of ownership difference comes down to the purchase cost. The TSI versions did cost more than their corresponding MPI models.

• Price Premium (Approximate Ex-showroom difference): The TSI variants were typically priced about ₹1.44 lakh higher than the equivalent MPI models, depending on the trim level and transmission.

Since the operating expenses are so comparable, a “break-even point” analysis doesn’t come into play here either. You’re not purchasing the TSI to offset fuel expenses; you’re paying more money for the better performance and ownership feel. The cost analysis isn’t about recouping the additional cost investment via savings at the pump, but more about whether the improved performance warrants the greater purchase cost.

Which Volkswagen Polo is Right for You?

Choosing between the MPI and the TSI is a classic case of head vs. heart.

For the Practical, Budget-Conscious Buyer:

• Best Pick: Volkswagen Polo 1.0 MPI.
• Why: If city trips are the majority of your driving, if short commutes are the norm, and if a lower front-end purchase price is desired, then the MPI is the more sensible choice. It’s a straightforward, reliable engine with good Polo mileage and an unpretentious ownership life. You get the good Polo build quality without the added expense of the capability that you might never need to use.

For the Enthusiast or Highway Driver:

• Best Pick: Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI.
• Why: Only the TSI makes sense if you’re an enthusiast who likes to drive, likes good performance, and has frequent highway trips. The hit of power from the TSI is akin to an addiction and makes the drive a delight. The extra performance and the option of getting a 6-speed manual or an excellent autobox make the vehicle a more spirited car. The reduced city mileage is a small compromise to make compared to the huge fun quotient.

In Short:

• Polo MPI: Best for city commuters, budget buyers, and those who prioritize reliability and lower initial cost.
• Polo TSI: Best for driving enthusiasts, frequent highway users, and those who are willing to pay a premium for performance.

Volkswagen Polo has a legacy of satisfying two types of owners. The MPI provided an economical and dependable offer, and the TSI confirmed the Polo as the driver’s choice of hatchback. Ultimately, the choice is yours, depending on what you value more: economy and affordability, or fast acceleration.

FAQs